Lame-duck Congress might actually do something: speed up energy projects

The Senate will vote to push through a giant — and controversial — permitting reform bill.

by Justine CalmaNov 6, 2026, 6:42 PM UTC

The Senate will vote to push through a giant — and controversial — permitting reform bill.

by Justine CalmaNov 6, 2026, 6:42 PM UTC Justine Calma is a senior science reporter covering energy and the environment with more than a decade of experience. She is also the host of Hell or High Water: When Disaster Hits Home, a podcast from Vox Media and Audible Originals.

A massive permitting bill that could help energy projects come online much quicker and potentially lower utility bills for Americans is advancing with bipartisan support. And while it could be a catalyst for lots of clean energy, it could also speed up polluting projects and limit oversight of new data centers.

With data centers demanding more electricity for AI, environmental advocates fear that developers could take advantage of the reforms to evade public scrutiny and rely more heavily on fossil fuels. The bill sacrifices caution for speed, limiting environmental reviews and preventing communities from stopping a project from moving forward by taking it to court.

“Whether it is permits to bulldoze wetlands, the fast-tracking of gas pipelines or general environmental review, with this legislation, data centers would not need to answer to the concerns of local communities,” Christy Goldfuss, executive director of the nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), says in an email to The Verge. “People would be shocked to realize their representatives are rushing such a consequential decision.”

The sea change in Congress following the midterm elections could put the bill in an even more precarious position, giving Democrats a better shot at pushing for their priorities in the bill and potentially triggering a fight with President Donald Trump. Should it come up for a vote during the current lame-duck session or get kicked to next year, the bill will test whether Democrats and Republicans can actually get something done to address some of the biggest issues voters carried with them to the polls: rising energy costs and data centers encroaching on their communities.

“They swung big with this bill. It’s a really good bipartisan compromise,” Xan Fishman, executive vice president of the Energy Program at the Bipartisan Policy Center, tells The Verge.

Four senators calling themselves the “four corners” — Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Martin Heinrich (D-NM) — introduced the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act (BAAJA) on September 30th. “If we can pass this bill, we will flood the grid with clean, affordable energy and make data centers start paying their fair share,” Whitehouse, a climate hawk, said in the press release.

The announcement simultaneously garnered support from climate and renewable energy groups, as well as fossil fuel interests. “Pass the frickin’ bill so we can start building things again,” the US Oil & Gas Association said in a statement.

The Senate could vote to move the bill forward as early as next week, teeing it up for potential passage before the end of the year, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center. Fishman expects President Trump will want to sign the bill if the current Republican-controlled Congress acts, adding in an email that the White House has been “very involved” in negotiations. Newly empowered Democrats, however, could decide to drag out debate on the bill until next year in order to make fewer concessions to Republicans.

If it becomes law, the bill would limit the reach of bedrock laws (stemming back to the 1970s environmental movement) that protect water resources and endangered species and give the public an opportunity to weigh in on large projects that might impact public health. Over the years, however, reviews that once took months at most might take several years or even decades, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center. Fishman attributes the delays largely to lengthy legal battles. Now, agencies have to spend more time preparing for lawsuits as they consider permitting applications, Fishman says. That holds up development on all kinds of infrastructure projects, including cleaner energy alternatives to fossil fuels.

Fishman expects BAAJA to be very effective in amending outdated permitting rules that have become burdensome to projects across the board, even those that might ultimately have a net positive impact on the environment. “Sometimes, bureaucratic processes that are created with good intentions kind of spiral out of control,” he says. “You want to protect the environment, you want to protect people, but you want to get to a yes or no [on a permit application] in a reasonable amount of time and you don’t want to have this endless litigation cycle.”

The bill would set a 45-day deadline for a lead agency to issue a decision on a project after completing an environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In many cases, NEPA review is the only opportunity for nearby residents to weigh in on large projects that involve the federal government. And it’s been a key tool for opponents to high-profile projects including the Dakota Access and Keystone XL pipelines. BAAJA narrows the scope of projects subject to NEPA, creating exclusions for transmission upgrades and certain pipeline expansions, to name a couple. Many projects receiving federal loans or grants or that have already been through a similar state environmental assessment would no longer trigger NEPA review.

The bill also sets a strict ne

Source: www.theverge.com — article syndicated from the publisher’s feed; all rights remain with the original publisher.